Critics Of The Republic, Plato’s Contribution To The History Of Political Theory

Below is a free term papers summary of the paper "Critics Of The Republic, Plato’s Contribution To The History Of Political Theory." If you sign up, you can be reading the rest of this term papers in under two minutes. Registered users should login to view this term paper.

Term Paper Title	Critics Of The Republic, Plato’s Contribution To The History Of Political Theory
# of Words	1901
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)	7.6

     Critics of The Republic,  Plato’s contribution to the history of political theory, have formed two distinct opinions on the reasoning behind the work.  The first group believes that The Republic is truly a model for a political society, while the other strongly objects to that,  stating it as being far too fantastic for any society to operate successfully by these suggested methods.  In an exchange between Crito and Dionysius, this argument is first introduced, with Crito siding with those who agree that The Republic is a realistic political model, and Dionysius arguing on behalf of those who doubt it as being realistic, claiming it to be a criticism of politics in general.
     Both sides have legitimate arguments, and there is evidence within the text to support each opinion.  When Plato wrote Gorgias, he made it clear where exactly he stood on his personal involvement in politics (Cornford 1941, xix).  “Unlimited power without the knowledge of good and evil is at the best unenviable, and the tyrant who uses it to exterminate his enemies and rivals is the most miserable of men--a theme to be further developed in The Republic (Cornford xx).”  But here, Plato was referring to the politics of his time, and critics who sided with Crito believed that The Republic was Plato’s way of introducing a political system in which he would feel comfortable supporting (Plato 204).  Conversely though, The Republic itself is summed up this way:
     Well, one would be enough to effect all this reform that now seems so incredible,           if he had subjects disposed to obey; for it is surely not impossible that they should      consent to carry out our laws and customs when laid down by a ruler.  It would be      no miracle if others should think as we do; and we have, I believe, sufficiently      shown that our plan, if practicable, is the best.  So, to conclude:  our institutions      would be the best, if they could be realized, and to realize them, though hard, is not      impossible (Plato 210-211).



     These institutions of which Plato speaks are described in the body of The Republic, and not only does Plato explain how they are carried out in current society, but he offers his own alterations, which is the primary cause of the arguments over the content of the book (Plato 222).
     In his fifth chapter, entitled “The Problem Stated,” Plato introduces what he

believes to be wrong with the current system of politics (Plato 41).  He starts by

describing the Social Contract the...

This is not the end of the termpaper! Register below to see the complete version of this term paper.

Membership Plans	Credit Card	Check

1 month membership

3 month membership (You Save 50%)

6 month membership (You Save 67%)

Copyright © 2002-2007 Mid Term Papers. All rights reserved. This term papers website is used for research purposes only.
If you have forgotten your username or password, please click here.
If you like to cancel your account, please click here.

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22