Through A Narrow Chink: An Ethical Dilemma

Below is a free term papers summary of the paper "Through A Narrow Chink: An Ethical Dilemma." If you sign up, you can be reading the rest of this term papers in under two minutes. Registered users should login to view this term paper.

Term Paper Title	Through A Narrow Chink: An Ethical Dilemma
# of Words	1164
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)	4.66

Through A Narrow Chink:  An Ethical Dilemma

Through A Narrow Chink:  An Ethical Dilemma

by Pablo Baez
Chemistry 104
Prof. Holme

     In 1951 Carl Djerassi, with the Mexican pharmaceutical company Syntex,
developed the first oral contraceptive by synthesizing and altering the natural
hormone Progesterone into a superpotent, highly effective oral progestational
hormone called "norethindrone".
     Admittedly, the dynamics and importance of this find were astounding,
since before this the only means of contraception was abortion, and even that
was not legalized at the time.
     The race to produce this synthetic agent was highly competitive, being
sought after by many pharmaceuticals throughout the world, and for a small
fledgling company in Mexico of all places to find it first only added to the
excitement of the achievement.
     Yet aside from all this excitement and competitive fervor something
great and disturbing was being bypassed.  Science, in my view had done something
great without looking into the possibilities of where this would lead.
     I believe Djerassi, similar to most scientists of his day, was so
entranced by the excitement of synthesizing his product and achieving his goal
that he did not stop to think of the ramifications of his accomplishment.  The
ethical dilemma was not explored before hand, and this to me is the great
tragedy of most scientific discovery, since I firmly believe each scientist is
responsible for that which he creates.
     Djerassi does confront a few questions of ethics and morality after the
fact.
     On page 61, in chapter 6, he reflects on the argument of the use of poor
Mexican and Puertorrican women for preliminary experiments.  Is this just
another manifestation of exploitation of the poor?
     Djerassi says absolutely not.
     Yes, the poor our the initial guinea pigs for research but this is no
different from what dentists, barbers, and young surgeons do.  All of these
groups use the poor to hone their skills, not because of the poor women's
ignorance but because middle class, suburbanite, white women are unlikely to
volunteer their services for the sake of science.
     My main problem with this is that he claims they will not "volunteer"
their services.  Of course not, they are aware of the possible detrimental
effects of such experimentation.  This is obviously because they are probably
more highly educated the poor Hispanic women.    Poverty often precludes a lack
of good schooling and education.  Thus the awareness of such a grou...

This is not the end of the termpaper! Register below to see the complete version of this term paper.

Membership Plans	Credit Card	Check

1 month membership

3 month membership (You Save 50%)

6 month membership (You Save 67%)

Copyright © 2002-2007 Mid Term Papers. All rights reserved. This term papers website is used for research purposes only.
If you have forgotten your username or password, please click here.
If you like to cancel your account, please click here.

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22