| Home | Join | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Login | Logout |
|
|||
No Police Department In The Country, Or The World, Is Free From Deviant OfficersBelow is a free term papers summary of the paper "No Police Department In The Country, Or The World, Is Free From Deviant Officers." If you sign up, you can be reading the rest of this term papers in under two minutes. Registered users should login to view this term paper.
Offenses can be something as minor as a department policy infraction such as being out of uniform or as major as a criminal violation such as assault. Since the earliest police departments were formed, society has tried to find a way to “police the police”. Today, this is done through internal affairs or a similar office inside the department and civilian review boards which are independent from the police. Each department has some way to discipline those officers who find themselves on the other side of the law. The decision to suspend an officer, or to take any other action against them, can come form the chief or a board of officers. Complaints may come form citizens, fellow officers, or from superiors. Most small departments will leave the handling of these complaints to the chief or the commissioner’s discretion. Larger departments usually will have some type of review board to handle complaints. These boards would be made up of a number of officers and supervisors, and have the ability to conduct investigations, hold hearings and pass disciplinary decisions. Some boards may work as an advisorial group to the chief, who would have final decisions. This is one of today’s most widely used ways to keep law enforcement officer in check. In his article, Herman Goldstein points out that: However strongly committed an agency may be to disciplining the conduct of its employees, it is not likely to criticize the actions of an officer which, though of questionable legality, are in accord with a practice knowingly and consciously engaged in by the agency. This suggests that department- wide policies, as distinct from the individual conduct of police officers, can be adequately controlled only from outside a police department (1967, p.164). This now raises questions as to an internal board’s ability to stop police misconduct. In comparing the Police Advisory Board (external) and the Police Board of Inquiry (internal) for the city of Philadelphia, James Hudson points that the board of inquiry works best when “directed inward toward the police organization (1972, 429)”, meaning it should deal with policy violation within the department, not complaints from citizens. External review is now shown as a necessary measure. Boards are made up of interested citizens who advise th... This is not the end of the termpaper! Register below to see the complete version of this term paper.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | Login | Logout | Join | Privacy Policy | Contact Us |
|
Copyright © 2002-2007 Mid Term Papers. All rights reserved. This term papers website is used for research purposes only. If you have forgotten your username or password, please click here. If you like to cancel your account, please click here. |
|
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 |