| Home | Join | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Login | Logout |
|
|||
IntroductionBelow is a free term papers summary of the paper "Introduction." If you sign up, you can be reading the rest of this term papers in under two minutes. Registered users should login to view this term paper.
No doubt one of the most difficult, complex and controversial legal issues of the last century has been the return of traditional lands to the indigenous people of colonial nations. The modern Western governments can’t be expected to return entire continents to the descendents of the traditional owners, but certainly it is important that some compensation be made for the theft of land during colonisation. Australian Aboriginal land legislation has been particularly problematic due to the fact that a special legal relationship has never been established between Aboriginal groups and the Commonwealth government. In the U.S., the cases presided over by Supreme Court Justice John Marshall established a fiduciary relationship between the federal government and federally recognised Native American groups, which were declared ‘domestic dependent nations.’ This meant their reservations were not subject to State-level legislation, something which has been a great impediment to Australian Aboriginal fights for land. Through the myriad of legislation, I have attempted to establish a concise order of the most crucial events to date in the struggle for Aboriginal land rights. 1. Aboriginals’ loss of land at the hands of English common law At the heart of it all, the Aborigines want their land back because British colonists took it. Since the landing of the First Fleet in 1788, the debate has been the same: did they have the right to take it? William Blackstone is most commonly credited for establishing the basic tenets of English colonisation and the concept of Terra Nullius. Because Australia was uninhabited (that is, uncultivated), it was considered to be settled peacefully, allowing the laws of England to take precedence over Aboriginal law immediately following the settlers’ setting foot upon the continent. However, reality wasn’t near peaceful, as conflict and bloodshed plagued the colonisation process. Mildred Kirk says it best: ‘Aboriginal law was not recognised, but British common law was to apply to newcomers and Aborigines alike, and Aborigines were entitled to its full protection. It is clear that events overtook legal theory.’ English law did not allow for theft any more than Aboriginal law; it was merely a matter of the colonists failing to recognise Aboriginal land tenure. Because of this, the Crown considered all the lands of the Australian continent to be under its domain, as it was later established in the 1847 case Attorne... This is not the end of the termpaper! Register below to see the complete version of this term paper.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | Login | Logout | Join | Privacy Policy | Contact Us |
|
Copyright © 2002-2007 Mid Term Papers. All rights reserved. This term papers website is used for research purposes only. If you have forgotten your username or password, please click here. If you like to cancel your account, please click here. |
|
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 |