| Home | Join | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Login | Logout |
|
|||
Clinton Parallels Not JFK, But LBJ // In Life, Outlook And Focus On Place In HisBelow is a free term papers summary of the paper "Clinton Parallels Not JFK, But LBJ // In Life, Outlook And Focus On Place In His." If you sign up, you can be reading the rest of this term papers in under two minutes. Registered users should login to view this term paper.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Clinton is keenly interested in how history will judge him. He began his administration with John F. Kennedy as a model and now compares himself to Theodore Roosevelt, a president who made a great mark on the White House and the country, though there was no war during his administration. However, it is a president Clinton almost never mentions whom he resembles most closely - Lyndon B. Johnson. The men and their administrations have much in common. Their domestic agendas and failings, even their backgrounds, are surprisingly similar. Both men grew up in small Southern towns in relatively deprived circumstances, with an appreciation for the suffering of the disadvantaged. But the Clinton-Johnson connection is most evident in their personalities. Johnson was, and Clinton is, the product of large appetites for recognition and fame through politics. Like Johnson, Clinton's vocation has always been using public affairs to make a personal mark that would echo through history. Johnson was an especially grandiose character. "I understand you were born in a log cabin," German Chancellor Ludwig Erhard told Johnson. "No, no!" Johnson replied. "You have me confused with Abe Lincoln. I was born in a manger." Clinton is not quite as grandiose. But he is intensely preoccupied with his likely historical standing. A poll of historians in late 1996 that ranked him as a below-average president sent him into a snit. He still obsesses about his place in history, expressing hopes that he will ultimately be seen as at least a near-great leader. A need for public affection has echoed through the careers of both men. Johnson couldn't stand to be criticized. Every negative comment was a deep wound because he wanted everyone to love him. He saw his War on Poverty and Great Society programs as almost personal gifts to the country, for which he expected unqualified praise. The inner-city riots of 1965-68 were thus regarded as an expression of ingratitude. Johnson's rage toward liberals who opposed him over the Vietnam War was palpable. "What's the difference between cannibals and liberals?" he asked some of them. "Cannibals don't eat their friends." Like Johnson, critics, especially in the media, enrage Clinton. Clinton seems to despise the journalists who beat on him unme... This is not the end of the termpaper! Register below to see the complete version of this term paper.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | Login | Logout | Join | Privacy Policy | Contact Us |
|
Copyright © 2002-2007 Mid Term Papers. All rights reserved. This term papers website is used for research purposes only. If you have forgotten your username or password, please click here. If you like to cancel your account, please click here. |
|
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 |