| Home | Join | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Login | Logout |
|
|||
Theoretical ReflectionsBelow is a free term papers summary of the paper "Theoretical Reflections." If you sign up, you can be reading the rest of this term papers in under two minutes. Registered users should login to view this term paper.
[Category]: Business [Paper Title]: [Text]: Theoretical Reflections - Contingency Theory Research Notes (Considerations for Technology Driven Reform) Contingency theory suggests that appropriate behavior in a given situation depends on a wide variety of variables and that each situation is different. What might work in one organization, set of issues, or employee group might not work in a different organization with its own set of issues and employees. Effectiveness of schools, for example, is contingent upon the leadership style of the principal and the favorableness of the situation (Hendricks, 1997). This methodology acknowledges that no one best way exists to manage in a given situation and those situational variables, from both the internal and external environments impact on leadership practice. Leadership styles cannot be fully explained by behavioral models. The situation in which the group is operating also determines the style of leadership that is adopted. Several models exist which attempt to understand the relationship between style and situation; the four major theories comprising my contingency category are Fiedler's Contingency Model, Situational Theory, Path-Goal Theory, and the Vroom-Yetton Leadership Model. Fiedler's Contingency Model Fiedler's model assumes that group performance depends on: Leadership style, described in terms of task motivation and relationship motivation. Situational contingencies, determined by three factors: 1. Leader-member relations - Degree to which a leader is accepted and supported by the group members. 2. Task structure - Extent to which the task is structured and defined, with clear goals and procedures. 3. Position power - The ability of a leader to control subordinates through reward and punishment. High levels of these three factors give the most favorable situation, low levels, the least favorable. Relationship-motivated leaders are most effective in moderately favorable situations. Task-motivated leaders are most effective at either end of the scale. Fiedler suggests that it may be easier for leaders to change their situation to achieve effectiveness, rather than change their leadership style. Fielder, F. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw. This theory defines factors that determine how the leader's personality and styles of interacting with others affects the group performance and organization. The appropriateness of the ... This is not the end of the termpaper! Register below to see the complete version of this term paper.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | Login | Logout | Join | Privacy Policy | Contact Us |
|
Copyright © 2002-2007 Mid Term Papers. All rights reserved. This term papers website is used for research purposes only. If you have forgotten your username or password, please click here. If you like to cancel your account, please click here. |
|
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 |