In The Two Articles, Heloisa Sabin And Peggy Carlson Argued On The Issue About A

Below is a free term papers summary of the paper "In The Two Articles, Heloisa Sabin And Peggy Carlson Argued On The Issue About A." If you sign up, you can be reading the rest of this term papers in under two minutes. Registered users should login to view this term paper.

Term Paper Title	In The Two Articles, Heloisa Sabin And Peggy Carlson Argued On The Issue About A
# of Words	789
# of Pages (250 words per page double spaced)	3.16

In the two articles, Heloisa Sabin and Peggy Carlson argued on the issue about animal testing.  There does not seem to be any agreement between the two writers, while there is an obvious disagreement between them.  Sabin agrees to Animal Testing: “Animal research saves human lives” but Carlson disagrees: “Animal tests are unreliable”.

Animal testing is quite an arguable topic in the world.  In Sabin’s article, she stated the example of her husband using polio vaccine as her persuasion as he was one that benefited a lot from the outcome of animal testing.  Her husband, Albert Sabin, inventor of oral polio vaccine, told a reporter before his death in 1993, “There could have been no oral polio vaccine without the use of innumerable animals, a very large number of animals.”(Sabin)  Sabin shows that polio has been eradicated in Western Hemisphere in about forty years after the polio vaccine was introduced to United State.  She truly believes that the polio vaccine saves the world from the fear of the polio, therefore she repeatedly reference to “reality” to help her in persuading readers that animal testing is in fact an advantage.  Since she shows that the information she pointed out was from the reality, not just something she made up, this makes readers easier to believe in her point of view.
As can be expected, Carlson’s disagreement with Sabin about animal testing leads her to a dramatically different point of view as well.  In Carlson’s article, she provides the information about how inaccurate animal testing are to support her point of view.   “Nearly everything that medicine has learned about what substances cause human cancer and birth defects has come from human clinical and epidemiological studies because animal experiments do not accurately predict what occurs in humans.”(Carlson)  Carlson uses cancer and birth defects as an example to disagree with Sabin’s example of her husband using polio vaccine.  “It was unfortunate that the original polio vaccine was produced using monkey calls instead of available human cells as can be done today.”(Carlson)  Carlson pointed this out because this sentence tells us that the medicine available today may be created or experimented on a non-human being.  Using substances from animals other than human to produce medicine for human may result in serious disease.
...

This is not the end of the termpaper! Register below to see the complete version of this term paper.

Membership Plans	Credit Card	Check

1 month membership

3 month membership (You Save 50%)

6 month membership (You Save 67%)

Copyright © 2002-2007 Mid Term Papers. All rights reserved. This term papers website is used for research purposes only.
If you have forgotten your username or password, please click here.
If you like to cancel your account, please click here.

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22