| Home | Join | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Login | Logout |
|
|||
Last Year, President Clinton’s State Of The Union Address Came Just As The MonicBelow is a free term papers summary of the paper "Last Year, President Clinton’s State Of The Union Address Came Just As The Monic." If you sign up, you can be reading the rest of this term papers in under two minutes. Registered users should login to view this term paper.
Last year, President Clinton’s State of the Union address came just as the Monica Lewinsky scandal was exploding into public view. Clinton nevertheless gave a rousing speech, memorable for his call to “save Social Security first.” This year, the address came as Clinton stands trial in the Senate. Once again, he avoided any mention of his political troubles, instead stressing that the country’s prosperity must be used to prepare for the burden of a rapidly aging population in the next century. President Clinton addresses certain major topics in the State of the Union addresses each year. The address delivered on January 19, 1999 was about ‘A Stronger 21st Century America.’ The state of the nation's economy is strong, indeed. Moreover, we have a duty to keep it strong. The Year 2000 problem will hit us in 346 days, whether we're ready or not. Paying only lip service to the issue will not make it go away. The president needs a real plan to ensure that our nation's closely entwined computer networks are ready. Maintaining our strong economy, in the face of international uncertainty, requires our government to relieve American families from the highest-ever peacetime tax burden that today makes the tax payers unable to save for their retirements and their children's education. Keeping the economy strong means keeping government's hands out of the stock market. Consider the potential for abuse if the federal government controlled $700 billion of investments in private companies -- 10 times the assets of the largest mutual fund. The 'independent board' that overseas the management of the hundreds of billions of investment dollars will be appointed by politicians and be inherently political. Before long, politicians will call for withdrawing funds from any company that doesn't do their bidding. Government ownership of private companies can only create incentives for political corruption. How could corporations and their executives refuse campaign contributions to politicians who, by withdrawing government investment in th... This is not the end of the termpaper! Register below to see the complete version of this term paper.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | Login | Logout | Join | Privacy Policy | Contact Us |
|
Copyright © 2002-2007 Mid Term Papers. All rights reserved. This term papers website is used for research purposes only. If you have forgotten your username or password, please click here. If you like to cancel your account, please click here. |
|
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 |