| Home | Join | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Login | Logout |
|
|||
INTERNET CENSORSHIPBelow is a free term papers summary of the paper "INTERNET CENSORSHIP." If you sign up, you can be reading the rest of this term papers in under two minutes. Registered users should login to view this term paper.
Last October, congress passed and President Clinton signed into law a new "sequel" to the unconstitutional Communications Decency Act. This new Internet censorship bill, the Child Online Protection Act or COPA (a.k.a. "CDA II"), would establish criminal penalties for any commercial distribution of material deemed "harmful to minors". Although I feel that this law will probably be overturned like CDA, it shows how determined some politicians are to ignore our constitutional rights to free speech and impose their own views of what’s "indecent" and "harmful to minors" on others. I believe that the government should have no business imposing these unconstitutional laws. The laws themselves are way to vague, many avocates of Internet censorship laws are ignorant of what the Internet really is or how it works, laws like these wouldn’t work, and there are many alternatives to government enforced laws to protect children that would be much less invasive. The bills for laws aimed at regulating the Internet for the sake of child safety are, in my opinion, extremely vague and broadsided. They give absolutely no definition of what should be considered "obscene" or "harmful to minors." Definitions annexed on to them are extremely broadsided and could not only ban pornography but also things like information on AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases, birth control, breast cancer, certain forms of artwork, and many other things that should never be considered "obscene." However Internet censorship laws could potentially make it illegal to publish things like this on the Internet, and in being so vague, there is plenty of room for abuse of laws like these. Politicians could misuse these laws to ban things that they personally consider immoral or simply don’t like even if they aren’t considered "offensive to minors" by most people, abridging our rights to free speech even further. Aside from the vagueness of these proposed laws, they could prove impossible to enforce. Many people who push laws like thes... This is not the end of the termpaper! Register below to see the complete version of this term paper.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home | Login | Logout | Join | Privacy Policy | Contact Us |
|
Copyright © 2002-2007 Mid Term Papers. All rights reserved. This term papers website is used for research purposes only. If you have forgotten your username or password, please click here. If you like to cancel your account, please click here. |
|
1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 |